We use cookies on this site to enhance your experience.
By selecting “Accept” and continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies.
Originally published in February 2025
Multiple choice questions (MCQs) remain an indispensable tool for many instructors and a common assessment method in undergraduate education. This is especially true for those teaching large, first-year introductory courses where grading written responses or alternative assessments can be more challenging. MCQs are relatively easy to grade with the use of technology, such as MyLS and iClickers, and allow for the timely posting of grades.
Student benefits include enhanced retention, opportunities for peer-based learning, and boosted confidence when used as self-assessment practice questions (Butler, 2018; Rempel et.al. 2023; Simkin & Kuechler, 2005; Weimer, 2018). As Laurier Teaching Fellow Steve MacNeil notes in this week’s Faculty Assessment Spotlight below, “multiple choice testing is not going away,” and shares how MCQs can be used both as an effective assessment strategy and a tool to promote student engagement.
Whether you are exploring how best to utilize multiple choice questions in your pedagogical practice or are looking for new ways to engage students with multiple choice testing, this week’s TEI newsletter provides strategies on effective multiple-choice approaches.
Starting with your course context, teaching approach, and course learning outcomes, which of the following strategies for incorporating multiple choice assessments will best support your teaching as well as student learning?
MCQs can be designed for different assessment purposes.
*The Right Answer?
Each of the above strategies points to different ways that MC approaches can be incorporated into your pedagogical practice. And while research suggests that “All of the Above” is not the best answer to use on MCQs (Dell & DeVries, 2024), it may be the right option for you as you explore the why, when, where, and how of multiple choice assessments. Watch Steve MacNeil’s faculty spotlight below for more innovative strategies for multiple choice testing!
Laurier Teaching Fellow Steve MacNeil from the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry shares innovative research-informed approaches to multiple choice testing that increase student engagement and support the application of higher-order learning. Steve discusses two creative approaches to multiple choice testing, IFAT and Personal Point Allocation, that give students both immediate feedback on their answers as well as opportunities to earn partial marks. With research from both his own courses and published studies, Steve shares test performance and feedback about students’ perceptions of these testing approaches and the importance of desirable difficulty in the learning process. Watch the Faculty Spotlight >>
Have you already adopted an effective MCQs approach and are looking to broaden your range of assessment options? Instructors can develop dynamic assessment practices by looking to additional TEI resources on assessment examples or incorporating authentic assessments to expand options for students to demonstrate learning in their courses.